|
With respect to the composition
of their armies, it is observable that, though thirsting for extended empire, and though, some of her leading men became generals of the highest
order, the Carthaginians, as a people, were any thing but personally warlike. As long as they could hire mercenaries to fight for them, they had
little appetite for the irksome training and the loss of valuable time which military service would have entailed on
themselves.
As Michelet remarks, "The life of an industrious merchant, of a Carthaginian, was too precious to be risked, as long as it
was possible to substitute advantageously for it that of a barbarian from Spain or Gaul. Carthage knew, and could tell to a drachma, what
the life of a man of each nation came to. A Greek was worth more than a Campanian, a Campinian worth more than a Gaul, or a Spaniard. When
once this tariff of blood was correctly made out, Carthage began a war as a mercantile speculation. She tried to make conquests in the hope
of getting new mines to work, or to open fresh markets for her exports. In one venture she could afford to spend fifty thousand mercnaries,
in another, rather more. If the returns were good, there was no regret felt for the capital that had been sunk in the investment; more
money got more men, and all went on well."
Armies composed of foreign mercenaries have in all ages been as formidable to their employers as to the enemy against whom
they were directed. We know of one occasion (between the first and second Punic wars, when Carthage was brought to the very brink of
destruction by revolt of her foreign troops. Other mutinies of the same kind must from time to time have occurred. Probably one of these
was the cause of the comparative weakness of Carthage at the time of the Athenian expedition against Syracuse, so different from the energy
with which she attacked Gelon half a century earlier, and Dionysius half a century later. And even when we consider her armies with
reference only to their efficiency in warfare, we perceive at once the inferiority of such bands of condotteri, brought together without
any common bond of origin, tactics, or cause, to the legions of Rome, which, at the time of the Punic wars, were raised from the very
flower of a hardy agricultural population, trained in the strictest discipline, habituated to victory, and animated by the most resolute
patriotism. And this shows, also, the transcendency of the genius of Hannibal, which could form such discordant materials into a compact
organized force, and inspire them with the spirit of patient discipline and loyalty to their chief, so that they were true to him in his
adverse as well as his prosperous fortunes; and throughout the checkered series of his campaigns, no panic route ever disgraced a division
under his command, no mutiny, or even attempt at mutiny, was ever known in his camp ; and finally, after fifteen years of Italian warfare,
his men followed their old leader to Zama, " with no fear and little hope," and there, on that disastrous field, stood firm around him, his
Old Guard, till Scipio's Numidian allies came up on their flank, when at last, surrounded and overpowered, the veteran battalions sealed
their devotion to their general by their blood!
"But if Hannibal's genius may be likened to the Homeric god, who, in his hatred to the Trojans, rises from the deep to
rally the fainting Greeks and to lead them against the enemy, so the calm courage with which Hector met his more than human adversary in
his country's cause is no unworthy image of the unyielding magnanimity displayed by the aristocracy of Rome. As Hannibal utterly eclipses
Carthage, so, on the contrary, Fabius, Marcellus, Claudius, Nero, even Scipio himself, are nothing when compared to the spirit, and wisdom,
and power of Rome.
The senate, which" voted its thanks to its political enemy, Varro, after his disastrous defeat, ' because he had not
despaired of the commonwealth,' and which disdained either to solicit, or to reprove, or to threaten, or in any way to notice the twelve
colonies which had refused their accustomed supplies of men for the army, is far more to be honored than the conqueror of
Zama.
This we should the more carefully bear in mind, because our tendency is to admire individual greatness far more than
national; and, as no single Roman will bear comparison to Hannibal, we are apt to murmur at the event of the contest, and to think that the
victory was awarded to the least worthy of the combatants. On the contrary, never was the wisdom of God's providence more manifest than in
the issue of the straggle between Home and Carthage.
|